Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
> I would go for:
> 
>   - Warn user if cherokee runs as root:
>     This is the source of the problem, the user should know about this  
> and be aware of the misconfiguration.
> 
>   - Let the OS do its job and take care of the permissions, and  
> therefore return errors only when the server cannot access the  
> resource. The idea is to be consistent with the system, if programs  
> run by root have super-powers, there is no reason to treat Cherokee  
> differently.
I'm not implying, that I have a say in this :), but I totally agree.

Sincerely,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to