On 2 May 2008, at 18:17, Stefan de Konink wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2008, Jack wrote: > >> The test also seems to have revealed a memory leak. When the test was >> done, cherokee process took about 100MB memory (it started with >> 2.5MB.) I wasn't sure if the leak was from static requests or dynamic >> requests. So I re-did 10,000 request with a static page, and didn't >> observe memory leak. In the dynamic page tests, memory usage kept >> growing, at the speed of around 100 bytes per request. When the load >> stopped, the memory didn't get released. > > VERY GOOD! I'm happy you found it! I think this accounts for my > previous > problems too. > >> Not sure if this has also been observed on Linux? > > Yes, under Linux this was also found. I only don't know if it was a > memoryleak resulting in high load (due to swapping) or something else.
This is the first notice I have got about this.. I'm checking it right away. Thanks for reporting Jack!! -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://cherokee-project.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
