Rodolfo Pilas wrote: > [mmmmhhhhjjjjjj, I hate this configuration of a list that do not > reply to the list directly.... I send here my previous message > quote]
It makes sense to me to keep it like that. Take a look at this article [1], it explains the reasons of not including Reply-to: [1] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html >>> You can start two cherokee web servers, one to listen 80 and other >>> to 9090. >> >> How? is necessary to need two executable of cherokee? and this >> executables stay in tow dorectories? is correct? > > Not really. > > You can start > cherokee -C cherokee80.cfg & > cherokee -C cherokee9090.cfg & Yeah, currently it is the only way to do it and in the short term it will not change. It was a design decision I took at the begging in order to try to improve the performance. -- Greetings, alo. http://www.alobbs.com _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
