Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
By the way, your request about supporting non standard ports for the
https server makes sense. I have committed a new patch to add a new
configuration option to set it:
===
Port 80
PortTLS 443
===
It will be included on 0.4.28 next week. :-)
hmm I guess I could build what's in svn since I need it yesterday... :-)
Yep, you can use SSLCertificateFile, SSLCertificateKeyFile and
SSLCAListFile inside the virtual hosts structures.
good. That's really fantastic.
> and completely unrelated but necessary, webdav? is it supported yet?
> Or is that bounty material?
It is not supported. I thought about making a bounty of it, but I
am not sure about it is really worth the effort. Do people use
WebDAV, is it really an important feature to be implemented?
well, since it accounts for half of my use of Apache, I would say really
a good thing to have. I have automated uploading camram packages for
testing using cadaver (what a wonderful name for application). yes, I
can always use rsync or scp so that the huge deal but I really find the
convenience of having a file share over the Web quite convenient.
be aware that this feature is not easy to implement given that Microsoft
is broken their implementation of a standard that they contributed to
not unlike soap and a few others.
--- eric
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.alobbs.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cherokee
