Well, maybe this one is out of topic but anyway...

I always wanted to have Cherokee in Irix, so after a while in front of
my SGI O2, edit some source files, touch configure, and deal with
getopt_long (), I was able to achieve a static-build of cherokee
0.7.2. This could build run smoothly (although cherokee-config hung up
shortly after launch cherokee, but the HTTP server is still running).

The binary is here: http://bsdero.gulags.org.mx/index.php#english_cherokee_irix
Maybe it can be on the "downloads" section.

I dont know if this build is useful for someone, but if so, it will
runs very well in a Tezro, Octane or any SGI computer more powerful
than my little O2. By the way, this version is compiled with nekoware
GCC.

By the way, I touch some source codes and the configure.in script,
maybe I can commit this changes? I'll try to do a compile & running of
current sources from svn...


On 7/25/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Send Cherokee mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Cherokee digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Introduction (Stefan de Konink)
>    2. Re: Introduction (Gunnar Wolf)
>    3. Re: Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update (Gunnar Wolf)
>    4. Re: Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update (Stefan de Konink)
>    5. Re: Introduction (Alvaro Lopez Ortega)
>    6. Re: Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update (Alvaro Lopez Ortega)
>    7. Re: Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update (Alvaro Lopez Ortega)
>    8. Re: Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update (Stefan de Konink)
>    9. I/O Bottleneck Verbage (M. David Peterson)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:36:21 +0200
> From: Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Introduction
> To: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: cherokee-list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Gunnar Wolf schreef:
>> Milo van der Linden dijo [Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:21:55PM +0200]:
>>> I have a virtual machine ready with the latest svn cherokee, lighttpd
>>> and apache to rerun the benchmarks. I am only waiting for the 0.8.0 to
>>> reach stable. Then I hope the new benchmarks will find their way to the
>>> website. I have automated the installation script for
>>> cherokee/apache/lighttpd. It can be re-run with every new release ;-)
>>> Hope that partially answers one of the questions.
>>
>> Virtual machines should be avoided when testing for performance - you
>> are incurring on the penalties of competing for resources _twice_ (on
>> each OS layer). If you want to give true statistics, do it as close as
>> possible to the metal!
>
> The method I proposed before was using some old machines (aka 486/PII)
> and allowing a fixed amount of time of requests. The slower the machine
> the better.
>
> But there is one thing in VMs that are actually very cool. That is the
> amount of cpu cycles used. So instead of of 10 seconds of requests, you
> could actually do 50000 request, and check the CPU usage for each
> implementation.
>
> It is not about the maximum performance on a Dell1950, because a kernel
> can make a difference. It is how much performance is required to deliver
> peak performance.
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:41:10 -0500
> From: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Introduction
> To: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: cherokee-list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:43:38PM +0200]:
>> >>> //1//- Monitoring website behaviour might be useful (2 comments
>> >>> including mine), but we prefer not to use Google (2 comments).
>> >>
>> >> Honestly, as far as the Cherokee project is concerned, tracking using
>> >> behavior is a red herring. It's a distraction from what matters most:
>> >> The number of active installations in use on the web.
>>
>> Completely agree. +1.
>
> If the webserver world were composed exclusively of Debian machines,
> all of them running popcon, this would be even more interesting to
> you. Still,
>
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=cherokee
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=apache2
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=lighttpd
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=boa
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=nginx
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=thttpd
>
> There are many other HTTP servers in Debian, of course... Those are
> the ones I got off the tip of my head.
>
> --
> Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
> PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
> Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:43:42 -0500
> From: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update
> To: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Cherokee Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:35:04AM +0200]:
>> >Debian is going to freeze the next stable release this week. We are
>> >currently including Cherokee 0.7.2-3 (all of the patches I've applied
>> >to the tree have been also sent to ?lvaro, and are said to be applied
>> >to the SVN tree).
>> >
>> >Is there some _really_ pressing reason I should try to push 0.8.x in
>> >Lenny? I would strongly prefer not doing so, as there is a reason for
>> >the testing period.
>>
>> Cherokee 0.8.0-pre does not include many new features. However,
>> there is a quite big difference regarding the performance and the
>> stability under very heavy loads.
>>
>> Actually, I'd vote for going with 0.8.0-pre instead of
>> 0.7.2. Please, let me know whether a 0.8.0-pre1 release would be
>> helpful. If so, I will release it within tomorrow.
>
> Ok - But are you _sure_ it's not worse stability-wise? I can do a high
> priority upload (which might get accepted in time, but I cannot assure
> you - we are quite close to the deadline!). I'm just about to go
> offline for several days, but I can try and build+upload tomorrow
> early before leaving.
>
> --
> Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
> PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
> Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973  F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:46:00 +0200
> From: Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update
> To: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Cherokee Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,        Alvaro
>       Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Gunnar Wolf schreef:
>> Ok - But are you _sure_ it's not worse stability-wise? I can do a high
>> priority upload (which might get accepted in time, but I cannot assure
>> you - we are quite close to the deadline!). I'm just about to go
>> offline for several days, but I can try and build+upload tomorrow
>> early before leaving.
>
>
> Someone *please* check if basic CGI works out of the box :)
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:45:31 +0200
> From: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Introduction
> To: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: cherokee-list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> On 25 Jul 2008, at 00:31, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
>> Quite unrelated to the site, but related to webpages (if that's what
>> you are familiar with): It would be very good if you could put some
>> work into the cherokee-admin webpages, adding some Javascripty
>> niceties to avoid the user losing his changes because he didn't click
>> on 'save'. Maybe even just a simple alertbox would do - or you could
>> go the whole AJAX way and send each individual change to the server as
>> it happens (it would be too much, IMHO), or an automatic submit when
>> the user navigates away, or... whatever you fancy ;-)
>
>
> Huge +1 for this.
>
> Even if many of us have learned to live with the usability issue that
> Gunnar is talking about, they should be resolved ASAP. I'd dare to say
> that they should be marked as high priority for Cherokee 0.9.0.
>
> The bottom line is: Cherokee includes cherokee-admin just to make
> users life easier, if it weren't easy to use, natural, and coherent,
> we would have failed even after having put a whole lot of work on it.
>
> --
> Greetings, alo.
> http://www.alobbs.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:51:24 +0200
> From: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update
> To: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Cherokee Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> On 25 Jul 2008, at 00:43, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>> Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 12:35:04AM +0200]:
>>>> Debian is going to freeze the next stable release this week. We are
>>>> currently including Cherokee 0.7.2-3 (all of the patches I've
>>>> applied
>>>> to the tree have been also sent to ?lvaro, and are said to be
>>>> applied
>>>> to the SVN tree).
>>>>
>>>> Is there some _really_ pressing reason I should try to push 0.8.x in
>>>> Lenny? I would strongly prefer not doing so, as there is a reason
>>>> for
>>>> the testing period.
>>>
>>> Cherokee 0.8.0-pre does not include many new features. However,
>>> there is a quite big difference regarding the performance and the
>>> stability under very heavy loads.
>>>
>>> Actually, I'd vote for going with 0.8.0-pre instead of
>>> 0.7.2. Please, let me know whether a 0.8.0-pre1 release would be
>>> helpful. If so, I will release it within tomorrow.
>>
>> Ok - But are you _sure_ it's not worse stability-wise? I can do a high
>> priority upload (which might get accepted in time, but I cannot assure
>> you - we are quite close to the deadline!). I'm just about to go
>> offline for several days, but I can try and build+upload tomorrow
>> early before leaving.
>
> IMO, it's worth trying. Cherokee 0.8.0-pre is clearly ahead of 0.7.2
> on many ways (mainly performance and stability).
>
> Would you need me to release a 0.8.0-pre1?.. or, would the auto-
> uploaded tarball be enough for this?
> http://www.cherokee-project.com/download/trunk/
>
> Cheers!
>
> --
> Greetings, alo.
> http://www.alobbs.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:02:35 +0200
> From: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update
> To: Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Cherokee Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
>
> On 25 Jul 2008, at 00:46, Stefan de Konink wrote:
>> Gunnar Wolf schreef:
>>> Ok - But are you _sure_ it's not worse stability-wise? I can do a
>>> high
>>> priority upload (which might get accepted in time, but I cannot
>>> assure
>>> you - we are quite close to the deadline!). I'm just about to go
>>> offline for several days, but I can try and build+upload tomorrow
>>> early before leaving.
>>
>> Someone *please* check if basic CGI works out of the box :)
>
> Of course it does... why wouldn't it? :-)
>
> The default configuration file points the '/cgi-bin' web directory to
> '/usr/lib/cgi-bin/' for executing CGIs. So, if you install any package
> shipping CGIs, they ought to work out of the box.
>
> Actually, a few hours ago I installed a new server running Mailman
> (one of the last CGI based applications?), and the interface appeared
> magically at http://server/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo right after
> installing the package.
>
> --
> Greetings, alo.
> http://www.alobbs.com/
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:21:41 +0200 (CEST)
> From: Stefan de Konink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee 0.8.0 quick update
> To: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Cherokee Mailing List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote:
>
>> > Someone *please* check if basic CGI works out of the box :)
>>
>> Of course it does... why wouldn't it? :-)
>
> Because last time *I* checked from svn, it was only compiled when I did
> --enable-beta, that was one of the reasons why the cherokee-admin broke
> for me.
>
>
> Stefan
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 23:28:19 -0600
> From: "M. David Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: [Cherokee] I/O Bottleneck Verbage
> To: cherokee-list <[email protected]>
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=utf-8
>
> I find the following verbiage at http://cherokee-project.com a little
> strange:
>
>>> One of the intended objectives is being able to turn the server's hard
>>> drive into the effective bottleneck of the system. That is a lot. With
>>> each release we get closer to our goal. Admittedly, a very tough goal
>>> to reach. After that there's really not much left to do to improve a
>>> High Performance web server such as Cherokee. <<
>
> In particular:
>
> "After that there's really not much left to do to improve a High
> Performance web server such as Cherokee."
>
> The above places a specific shelf-life on the Cherokee project as far as
> innovation is concerned.  While I recognize the reasoning, placing the
> hard drive at the center of I/O operations seems to neglect the fact that
> we're well into the transition between magnetic media and RAM-based
> distributed storage (e.g. memcached), using the hard drive as nothing more
> than a long term storage system.  AKA, Magnetic Drives are the new Tape.
>
> Could I suggest a rewrite of the above to something similar to:
>
>>> The speed at which any web server can serve requests for content is
>>> both directly tied to and limited by the I/O speed of underlying
>>> hardware and operating system.  In this regard, a web servers
>>> performance is measured by the latency incurred after an I/O request to
>>> the underlying system has completed.
>
> The primary objective of the Cherokee project is to reduce to zero the
> latency incurred between the time a dynamic or static system I/O request
> has completed and the time the resulting content is served to the
> requesting client. Admittedly, a very tough goal to reach.  In fact, it
> might be impossible.  But achieving that which was once seen as impossible
> is what drives innovation.  And it's innovation that drives the ongoing
> development of the Cherokee project, bringing us closer to the impossible
> with each new release. <<
>
> ?
>
> Okay, that last parts a little cheesy, and even the first part is only a
> suggestion.  But placing a shelf life on project innovation isn't what I
> would term a strong elevator pitch, which is exactly what those first two
> paragraphs represent.
>
> Keep up the great work! :D
>
> --
> /M:D
>
> M. David Peterson
> Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC
> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Mobile: (206) 999-0588
> http://3rdandUrban.com | http://amp.fm |
> http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/2354 |
> http://news.oreilly.com/m-david-peterson/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cherokee mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
>
>
> End of Cherokee Digest, Vol 1, Issue 4
> **************************************
>
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to