Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef: > From the Cherokee side, it is just another handler. You can configure > it exactly as any other. All the general functionality remains in place: > authentication, encoding, access restrictions, etc. > > Now, from the MySQL side, there will be a single user authenticating > against it. I can not really see the case in which it wouldn't be enough > though. Think that you can configure as many dbslayer handlers as you > wish (with different user, password, data bases and even MySQL hosts) > inside the same Cherokee server.
Yes, this makes a lot of sense and basically 'fixes' the connection pool problems of many database servers :) Since this would generate one single persistent connection to each server. It would be interesting to also distribute updates and insert statements to all database as online replication mechanism. I'll soon talk about this approach with the MonetDB development team :) Stefan _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
