This is what I wanted to forward, sorry again.

P.S: I need to sleep, I need to sleep... uff! :(.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Antonio Pérez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Access Restrictions question
To: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> Choosing handler "None" I get: "405 Method Not Allowed"...
>
> Yes, the best way is to set the handler to 'None' and mark the rule as
> 'Final'. That will do it.

Yes?... I assumed that was a bad way; I thought it should return 404 or so...

>> My question is: Am I doing right?, what's the best option to do this?.
>
> You are doing the technical stuff alright, although the rules behavior is
> quite unusual. As far as I can imagine, the only case where this sort of
> rules may be useful would be for rejecting requests of htpasswd and htdigest
> files. Is that the case?

No... I want to deny access to /store, /files and /cache of one phpbb3
instalation. What would you do?.

--
Saludos:
Antonio Pérez

ATENCIÓN: Antes de imprimir este mensaje valora si verdaderamente es necesario.
De esta forma contribuimos a la preservación del Medio Ambiente.



-- 
Saludos:
Antonio Pérez

ATENCIÓN: Antes de imprimir este mensaje valora si verdaderamente es necesario.
De esta forma contribuimos a la preservación del Medio Ambiente.
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to