Stefan de Konink wrote: > Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef: >> Stefan de Konink wrote: >> >>> Is it possible to apply an encoder on top of an handler, but specify >>> it per target? I thought in the past this could be configured, but >>> now I only see a global encoding (where I don't have a clue how to >>> specify my handler). >>> >>> I would like to gzip the output of my handler. >> >> Handlers and Encoders are completely independent. >> >> Right now encoders are applied depending on the request extension. >> However, it would be an interesting idea to change the extension >> checking by MIME type checking. > > So if I understand it correctly. If I would allow a request with the > name .txt go to my handler, and I allow .txt to be gzipped then it will > be automatically gzipped?
Yes. If the client browser requests it to be encoded, then it would. > My worries with MIME would be that there should happen actual processing > to check validness. Using MIME types looks like the correct thing to do, although it would most probably have a negative impact on the server performance. By the moment this RFE is just food for thought. -- Greetings, alo http://www.alobbs.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
