-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Alvaro Lopez Ortega schreef:
> Actually, the main issue would be that, being 
> an not-really-popular feature, its implementation would force us to 
> rework part of the server core, and that might impact the global server 
> performance.

The binding of adresses only happens once right? So I wonder how it can
affect performance.

Now alternatively this could be solved on the application layer. By
limiting the IP adresses that are allowed to access the server.


Stefan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEAREKAAYFAkiz51AACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn10IgCdF+J15n0vac/QC6y3sE0pVHhY
J9UAn25myeIkDptNWklPqSMt4cnG6Ov1
=XaCQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to