Beech Rintoul wrote: > On Tuesday 02 September 2008, Alvaro Lopez Ortega said: >> Beech Rintoul wrote: >>> That being said, after some tweaking I moved 0.8x to our main >>> port and except for a couple of minor issues (fixed) our users >>> are very happy with it. I also removed the -devel version because >>> I didn't feel it was needed anymore. We are also about to go into >>> a code freeze for the new releases and I wanted to make sure >>> Cherokee-0.8 was included. >> That's great news. >> >>> The only other request I've been getting is to make the admin >>> install optional for users who already have cherokee installed or >>> want to configure by hand. I haven't looked at that closely, but >>> I don't remember seeing a --with-cherokee-admin knob. So that may >>> take a bit of work. >> Yes, there is no parameter to omit the cherokee-admin installation. >> There reason behind it is simply that the configuration file is not >> meant to be modified by hand, so in 99% of the cases the final user >> will need the interface. >> >> I can only think of two scenarios where cherokee-admin could be >> skipped: Embedded systems and Cluster nodes. > > We do have at least one user who is looking into doing exactly that > (embedded). I think hes now using lighttpd, but he's very interested > in Cherokee.
Which is more than enough for adding the parameter.. -- Greetings, alo http://www.alobbs.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
