On Sunday 23 November 2008 15:43:25, Eric Drechsel wrote:
> .htaccess
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f
> RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d
> is to serve the static files if they exist, then fall through to the
> redirect rule otherwise. How difficult would it be to implement a
> "fall through to subsequent rules if file/dir isn't found" option for
> the Static content handler?
AFAIK, the fix was submitted last friday. I'll recheck the affected recipes
(Drupal included) to reflect the behavior you just described.
Thanks for the feedback ;)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://unixwars.com/
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
