On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 02-dic-08, at 02:11, Graham Dumpleton wrote: > > Dude, *stop it*. Seriously. > > Independently of whether I personally think that mod_swgi is simply a > pile, I haven't joined its mailing list to give off about it and > promote Cherokee; have I? It'd be lame.
He's not promoting. He's explaining the technical differences. I'm sure you'd be more than welcome to do the same on Apache or mod_wsgi's mailing lists (if anyone is on there asking about Cherokee). The OP seems long gone anyway, so it seems to be the same people in this mod_wsgi discussion as the last one we had on this list. ;-) > Let's face it. It is plain and simple: ignore the Apache+mod_wsgi > architectural madness for a second and make the real test. As I said, > you will see that it is a much faster solution - and of course, more > reliable and secure. > > But again, I don't think you are seeking any sort of technical > discussion here; so cut the.. noise, please. Graham seems to be the only one having a technical discussion it seems. Compare posts. He spends a lot more time talking about design details and implementation choices than the pro-Cherokee crowd. He's also been the only one to admit that neither Apache nor Cherokee are superior: choose whichever fits your needs best.* Why aren't you (Cherokee developers) addressing how you plan on supporting HTTP 100s? Why aren't you posting benchmarks showing how Cherokee+FastCGI+flup+Django is faster than Apache+mod_wsgi+Django? (or any Python web framework besides Django) Graham is posting lots and lots of useful information. Despite his excellent posts, I will still probably switch from Apache/mod_wsgi to Cherokee in the future because it better fits my particular needs. There's no reason to ask him to stop. If he's persuading anyone to leave Cherokee, than those people weren't making completely informed decisions to being with! If you feel Graham or I are caring on off topic discussions on the Cherokee mailing list, I'm sure either of us would be happy to stop if you sent us a personal e-mail asking us to cease off-topic discussions. Chastising him for giving lengthy informative replies to honest questions doesn't help the discussion in the least. * Sometimes I wonder if people see Cherokee/Lighttpd/nignx vs. Apache as a microkernel vs. macrokernel situation. If so its a large waste of time as I think there are ample examples to show that either design method can work. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
