Hi Nick! On Wednesday 10 December 2008 10:22:22, Nikolai Kondrashov wrote: > > that now lighttpd also has it, but if I have to make the jump I would > > rather jump to cherokee if possible. > We jumped to Lighttpd because of WebDAV, but after attempting to fix some of > Lighttpd quirks and seeing the code I'm all for returning to Cherokee. To > the point where it would be possible that I try to implement WebDAV in it > by myself. > > Sincerely, > Nick
Kudos to that!! :) If you do try, please don't hesitate joining us at the developers' mailing list (http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee-dev). Everybody is welcomed ;-) Cheers, Taher -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://unixwars.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
