On 15-ene-09, at 15:00, Paul Bartell wrote: > for adding on to non-free webservers. Zeus might be a possibility. (it > pops up every little bit on netcraft) > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Roberto Correa wrote: >>> 1.5.1.- Other FOSS servers >>> 1.5.1.1.- nginx >>> 1.5.1.2.- lighttpd >>> 1.5.1.3.- Apache >> >> httpd in busybox. >> >>> 1.5.2.- Non-free Web Servers >>> 1.5.2.1.- Microsoft IIS >>> 1.5.2.2.- ???? >> >> With the claims of LiteSpeed I want to see a comparison.
I'd remove the 1.5.1 and 1.5.2 points, actually. I cannot see the point on elaborating on any of those subjects. It's far more interesting to write about how to use Cherokee in different environments (~ 'httpd in busybox'), or explain what the extra value of being a FOSS project is (~ Non-free web servers). All those serves would be mentioned anyone if the book included benchmarks, common set up times, code quality analysis comparisons, etc. -- Greetings, alo http://www.alobbs.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
