Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > Hello there, > > Cherokee will support it eventually. At first look I'd say it isn't a > very important feature, although since all the required infrastructure > is already in place it'd be trivial to implement, actually. > > Lately, we've been talking about adding a new layer of processing > rules to the server. I think it's a fairly good idea, so most probably > that new feature will make it for Cherokee 1.0 (the upcoming Cherokee > 0.99 release is due within the next few days). > > I'd suggest you to run two servers as a temporal solution/work-around > while we get these last few details polished. > > Cheers! > > On 19-feb-09, at 03:06, pak9 wrote: > >> I saw the domain name configuration, in our embedded device we will >> have no domain name. It will just be an IP device. >> I will look in to launching two version and see if that is acceptable >> for our small foot print. >> >> Is this a limitation by design? Or if we were to patch it would it be >> useful for the group? > > -- > Octality > http://www.octality.com/ > > Thats great news to hear! We really like Cherokee! We have investigated all the web servers we could get our hands on and Cherokee comes out on top.
Thanks for the info, I will also see if we could come up with a patch for this as well. Veets. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
