On 11-may-09, at 19:25, Rick Walsh wrote: > I found the following in my config.log file, so I'm wondering how > rpl_malloc() gets defined from util.c/h > > | #define HAVE_MALLOC 0 > | #define malloc rpl_malloc > > I'm going to ask the cross-compiler crowd why it would fail that > test but, is not having the libc malloc/realloc a showstopper? Any > tips are appreciated.
As far as I remember, it's due an incompatible malloc() implementation. The autoconfig macro AC_FUNC_MALLOC redefines the function is needed. However, the function replacement can be found in cherokee/util.c. I've no idea why it failed to compile. Both the malloc() function check and re-implementation is in place and look fine to me. -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
