No I understand that there is optimisation at application level but I really mean direct comparisons between the various "connector" deployments by testing good examples of example websites.
My point was that a 1.6k static file really isn't what makes up a typical website - so why would you use it to benchmark? On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Leonel Nunez <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Is there any well-established, respected benchmark for webservers out > >> there? > > > > > > The problem with any web server benchmarks is they rarely show true > > real-world load patterns. > > > > Plenty show static content and because Cherokee can cache these, it's > > naturally pretty damned fast. Great! I'm glad but it doesn't show other > > important factors. I want to know if Django+SCGI+Cherokee is as fast as > > Django+ModWSGI+Apache. Same goes for PHP+FastCGI+Cherokee vs > > PHP+ModPHP+Apache. > > > > > I guess these optimizations must be done on the django , php o any > appserver side you want to use like by using cache at django side > > > > Saludos > > > Leonel > > >
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
