On Jul 8, 2009, at 10:39 AM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:

> Daniel L. Miller dijo [Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 12:06:55PM -0700]:
>> Is there a "rule of thumb" for determining the appropriate number of
>> FastCGI processes?  In my case, I'm supporting a small LAN of less  
>> than
>> 10 workstations, but I don't want any delays when they visit the
>> different PHP virtual servers.  I would think just 1 or 2 would be
>> sufficient - but is there something I'm missing?
>
> It is not _so_ important the amount of users, but the frequency of the
> hits and the complexity of your program. Do you expect to have a
> constant rate, say, more than one hit per five seconds? A execution
> time of over one second? If neither of those is true, you could be
> fine with a single process - of course, launching two (or even three)
> to avoid collisions won't hurt too much.


Isn't there a way to specify a range like in apache for the prefork  
worker? Minimal number of processes and a maximum would be great. Just  
in case some site gets slashdoted :)

--
Leonardo Santagada
santagada at gmail.com



_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to