El mar, 11-08-2009 a las 11:46 +0200, Alvaro Lopez Ortega escribió:
> No. Cherokee will have no problem what so ever to handle those virtual
> servers.
>
> The only down side would be that the current cherokee-admin interface
> isn't polished to work with such a big list of virtual servers. For
> instance, a search box for live-filtering the virtual server table
> would come really handy in this case. Beside that sort of potential
> GUI improvements, everything is alright.
Perhaps maybe a list of vservers page by page, with "previous" and
"next" buttons, :-).
Regards.
--
_ ____ ____ __ __
| |/ ___/ ___| \/ | Jose Illescas Perez. Linux User #73559
_ | | | | | | |\/| | TFNO: +34 925 266 219 FAX: +34 925 266 300
| |_| | |__| |___| | | | El Webteam de http://www.jccm.es
\___/ \____\____|_| |_| Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
