On 27-ago-09, at 17:25, Roberto De Ioris wrote: > *** > Disclaimer:
Hehe.. ‘benchmark’ is a word that always brings trouble. > cherokee+uwsgi_handler+uwsgi+trac > requests per second-> from 34.90 to 35.70 > > cherokee+scgi_handler+flup+trac > requests per second -> 30.26 to 32.40 Pretty interesting, that's ~15% faster! > (all the test are executed on unix sockets) Actually, I don't think you want to run it on a Unix socket. I've learned it the hard way. Even if a Unix socket may be slightly faster than a TCP socket, it's prone to fail (upon interpreters restarts or crashes). In fact, Cherokee used to configure a Unix socket for the PHP-Cherokee communication until the current version. We have detected so many 'random' problems with that set up that Cherokee 0.99.23 will use a TCP socket instead. You know, performance is only an acceptable goal when stability is completely ensured. -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
