You can make rules in a virtual server that are port specific. But if this management wise a good idea? I doubt it.
Stefan Op 30 sep 2009 om 10:02 heeft pub crawler <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:\ > Wanted to run what we are doing by everyone on the list and see if > anyone can help us improve upon what we are doing. > > Currently for our static content (JPGs, GIFs, CSS, etc.) we do this: > > INTERNET ---> Cherokee:80 ---> Varnish:81 ---> Cherokee:82 > > We use Varnish for caching and some of the cache type control features > it has. If something is not found in Varnish cache it forwards > request over to another instance of Cherokee on port 82. The 2nd > instance of Cherokee is another separate instance - different than our > main port 80 Cherokee. > > Is there any way to combine the two Cherokee instances into one? > > Does Cherokee support setting up Virtual Servers tied to specific > ports? > (i.e. images.pubcrawler.com:80 images.pubcrawler.com:82) > _______________________________________________ > Cherokee mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
