On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 15:41 > > from the web: > "Allows your Ruby on Rails applications to use 33% less memory on > average, when used in combination with Phusion Passenger." > > Is not only about the performance, is about how easy is to deploy apps > with passenger (downst matter raisl version or ruby framwork).
Sorry, you are right, i am seeing only the performance value, but the easy-of-use must not be the first thing to look at, in a need-to-be-rocksolid environment as a webserver. And from my experience more code you add to an application more bug she will have :) > > but i see that more complex to do and mantain than just integrate > passenger. look at the passenger code, is big. Really big. And most of the code is for supporting old rails-release. > > is not more complex to have a lot of little tricky wizards for each version > of each ruby framework and ruby version?? > This is a flaw on the frameworks that are not rack compliant, trying to supports all of them is surely the most important point to implement a passenger handler. If you think that this could improve the cherokee popularity, i will look at it, even if i think that in about a year this will became useless ;) (if rack grows as wsgi there will be no more need of a passenger-like approach) -- Roberto De Ioris http://unbit.it JID: [email protected] _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
