-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Michiel van Es schreef: > Just out of curiousity: > If I get it right, SSL virtual hosting in Cherokee is only available if: > > - You use a really recent OpenSSL version (self compiled or the latest > or use Fedora/FreeBSD - most known Linux distro's won't have the OpenSSL > with SNI build in).
Since SNI is there for many years the above staments is /really/ invalid. > - Your clients have to use at least Vista or a recent Firefox (most big > organizations still use Windows 2000/XP and IE 7 but not the Vista IE 7 > of even Windows 7) It has to be > IE6; the rest all supports it. And even if you use IE6 you will only get the nag screen, everything still works as expected. > I heard a couple of months a go that it would be perhaps possible to > implement the 'old' version of virtual hosts with unique ip-adresses and > use their own SSL certs/keys. Or at least cherokee project was thinking > about offering the old SSL virtual hosting. > Is this still going to be implemented or is cherokee the only webserver > forcing users to use SNI or run multiple cherokee instances (what is > waste of resources) ? I guess such things are always possible, and might get a speedup if organisations that require this behavior get support contracts ;) Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEAREKAAYFAkraThAACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn3mvACcCDqt0PEVC1pNtKaatW0zOoMb a9gAn0zUdUzO9Re7vdC/4xIK8oLl4Be2 =Xe0o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
