El mar, 11-05-2010 a las 13:24 -0700, James Pearson escribió: > [...] > > Do we get any "safety" guarantees with this release? For instance, > can I install 1.0.0 and know that any upgrades to 1.0.x won't require > any changes on my part, and 1.1.x will only add features (and not take > away - or change - any of those I'm relying on!)? Really, I like > something written down so that developers can't break the rules ;) , > like http://semver.org/ or Django's release process[0]. As I'm sure > you know, while many of us like the bleeding-edge, it is really not a > good quality to have in a sysadmin, and our managers tend to prefer > stability over fancy new features as well. >
Very good point you spotted here! I don't know if Cherokee will have different branches (ie. stable and development), or the version scheme you've proposed (1.0.x bug fixes, 1.y.0 new features, ...), but definitely it would be great to know it and to have it wrote down somewhere :) Regards, Juanjo -- jjm's home: http://www.usebox.net/jjm/ blackshell: http://blackshell.usebox.net/ ramble on: http://rambleon.usebox.net/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
