> Your idea it's more like a "rolling release" than maintaining two > releases, to avoid the extra man-power to do those backports over the > time. > > But I think we should make the extra effort, that won't be that > frequent, to fix the important bugs* while the development releases > reach a "stable" point again. > > It's not like having two branches, and it would make easier for the > users to have Cherokee in production, enjoying the bleeding edge stuff > and at the same time without having to worry in each upgrade. >
This is beginning to sound like a Debian vs. Gentoo discussion. IMO, the current model works fine and any production environment should have a testing server for any upgrades which might cause trouble. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
