> Your idea it's more like a "rolling release" than maintaining two
> releases, to avoid the extra man-power to do those backports over the
> time.
>
> But I think we should make the extra effort, that won't be that
> frequent, to fix the important bugs* while the development releases
> reach a "stable" point again.
>
> It's not like having two branches, and it would make easier for the
> users to have Cherokee in production, enjoying the bleeding edge stuff
> and at the same time without having to worry in each upgrade.
>

This is beginning to sound like a Debian vs. Gentoo discussion.
IMO, the current model works fine and any production environment
should have a testing server for any upgrades which might cause
trouble.
_______________________________________________
Cherokee mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee

Reply via email to