On 19/01/2011, at 22:11, Alvaro Lopez Ortega wrote: > On 19/01/2011, at 21:51, Diego Schulz wrote: > > I'm sorry, but I cannot agree this this. I do not think the rest of the > Cherokee users should lose any feature because of a functionality regression > in FreeBSD 8. Instead, if no alternative way of figuring the number of CPUs > was found, I'd rather disable the CPU meter on FreeBSD. At the end of the > day, the functionality is found on all OSes but on a concrete version of > FreeBSD. > > However, IMHO that would be a nasty workaround for running Cherokee on > FreeBSD 8. If you asked me, I'd say that the problem is actually on FreeBSD > 8, not Cherokee. Cherokee might have been the first project to hit the > issue, but it will certainly not the last one to require this lost > functionality. > > Do you know whether it was removed on purpose? It might be a just bug, > actually.
BTW, I forgot to thank you for investigating the issue. You are doing an amazing job working out the issue of the FreeBSD package. Thank you very much that!!! -- Octality http://www.octality.com/ _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
