Is the front-line cache appropriate for shared hosting scenarios? I've got a cPanel server currently hosting 59 sites that I'm looking to split into 3 or 4 VPSes (via Linux-Vserver) and potentially move to 3 or 4 separate Cherokee installations (I share the server with 4 people). How well does Cherokee perform with 20 or 30 virtual servers, and would this be a good thing to enable the "front-line cache" on, or should the cache only be enabled for the busiest sites?
________________________________ From: Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Sent: Wed, 8 June, 2011 6:16:40 PM Subject: Re: [Cherokee] Cherokee slower than Apache for some reason? Hi there, On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Roberto De Ioris <[email protected]> wrote: You should really test it on static file serving, to make a true comparison. > >mod_php and php-fpm are totally different beasts, you should post your fpm >config but take in account that in mod_php the php interpreter is embedded >in the webserver (questionable choice...) in fpm is run proxied via the >fastcgi protocol (can be a bit slower but gives you much more control and >security) I'd also recommend to upgrade to 1.2.98 so you can take advantage of "Front-Line Cache". It does make a very big difference when it comes to dynamic content handling. -- Greetings, alo http://www.octality.com/
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
