-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Op 30-08-11 20:47, Douglas Mayle schreef: > Currently, using system authentication (PAM) requires giving Cherokee > access to the system password files. SASL was designed to allow local > processes to perform authentication without needing this access. Are > there any plans for Cherokee to support SASL?
Once you acknowledge that sasl by itself is just another local or remote layer of authentication... it is not that different from PAM, LDAP and likes. Libraries are available so it isn't that difficult, so maybe you could log an RFE? <http://bugs.cherokee-project.com/> Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEAREKAAYFAk5dMw4ACgkQYH1+F2Rqwn0uKQCfe930rjMR4kkW/j5vfisi3iRu X2AAnjPO9Qg6V7ZSJV/aPtqWpOx/jEmr =Y3tS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
