Alvaro Lopez Ortega dijo [Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:58:20AM +0200]: > > > Gunnar has uploaded packages for Debian Unstable > > > > What should happen to get these packages in Stable? > > > > It'd suggest a backport. It's the most realistic way to get any new package > version ported to the Stable IMHO. > > Gunnar would be the best one the response to this question though.
Hi, Yes, it could be handled as a backport. However, I don't want to volunteer to do them, and in fact, I'd much rather not do so - I know you (as the development community) prefer having the latest release available everywhere, but if we were to follow that, we would not have a stable suite at all :) Cherokee 1.0.8 serves most of the users what it promises: A very fast, flexible and easy to configure Web Server. There are cases, yes, where some users would prefer a newer release - In that case, I'd suggest them to use non-official packages (such as what Leonel puts in the PPA). But for most users, a Web server should not be seen as something prone to change often. Infrastructure should remain stable throughout the lifecycle of the release. _______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
