On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:00 AM, Alvaro Lopez Ortega <[email protected]>wrote:
> I'd vote for the first one. ... > What do you think? +1: Makes perfect sense. Starting with a blank slate for the new QA process and then integrating the existing QA modules from the webserver repository once it makes sense to do so (i.e. letting both the webserver architectural update and QA project mature properly on their own before and then bridging them together once it makes sense to do so). I like it! Can you go ahead and create a the new ~/cherokee/qa.git project when you have a moment? -- /M:D M. David Peterson Co-Founder & Chief Architect, 3rd&Urban, LLC Email: [email protected] Voice: (801) 742-1064 http://amp.fm | http://mdavidpeterson.com
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
