Plus I wouldn't say Ubuntu has a "lot more users" - Debian is much, *much *older so I'd say it has many more users than Ubuntu does. Not sure if it's changed recently but a server installation of Ubuntu used to be heavier than a basic Debian installation.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 8:08 AM, Daniel Lo Nigro <[email protected]> wrote: > How can Cherokee have up-to-date packages for Ubuntu but not for Debian? > Surely the Ubuntu packages would need minimal modification to work on > Debian? > > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Stefan de Konink <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12/04/12 18:42, - - wrote: >> > I am angry about Cherokee Project. Not for the sake of being angry, >> > but because I love Cherokee but I just don't see it as an awesome >> > webserver anymore. It becomes something for insiders, developers and >> > nerds. :(((( >> >> I regret I say this probably, but there is a user friendly >> distribution called "Ubuntu" it looks like "Debian", but has a lot more >> users. It seems we do have up to date Cherokee packages for Ubuntu. >> >> Stefan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cherokee mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee >> > >
_______________________________________________ Cherokee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.octality.com/listinfo/cherokee
