Ken, what's your opinion on this comment from a customer at Amazon.com
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Carburetor questions

JIM, YOU CAN FIND THE ANSWER TO ALL YOUR QUESTIONS AND MUCH ,SIMPLY PURCHASE "CHEVELLE SS RESTORATION GUIDE' BY PAUL HERD. THIS BOOK LISTS NUMBERS AND DESCRIPTIONS FOR EVERYTHING FROM BUMPER TO BUMPER FOR 64-72 SS'S.   KENNETH
 
-------Original Message-------
 
From: Jim R Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, November 11, 2001 03:35:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Chevelle-List] Carburetor questions
 
Replies to this message are sent to The Chevelle Mailing List
------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

After looking through some of the recent Holiday sale catalogs
that have begun arriving (e.g. the OPG holiday catalog), I have a few
miscellaneous carburetor questions that I was wondering if anyone could
answer for me, as I don't have any experience working with them and I
don't know much about them (I want to learn what I can in this area that
is foreign to me before for when the aging one on my SS needs any
attention!).

As background, I have a 69 SS with a 72 402 truck crate engine in
it. The car is mainly original and basically stock except for a few mild
upgrades (e.g. 2.5" exhaust, electronic ignition, etc.) & I'd like to
keep it that way

Here are my questions:

1) How many CFM were the factory quadrajets used on bigblocks from the
69-72 time period? (I see that OPG sells aftermarket Edelbrock
carburetors with 600 & with 750 CFM ratings that are said to fit 64-77
cars, but what were the factory CFM rates? If I were to go with an
aftermarket model like an Edelbrock, which CFM would be closest to what
came out of the factory?).

2) What would be the differences between a 69 big block quadrajet and a
72 big block quadrajet? (I see that Year One sells only one Rochester
carburetor that they say fits 68-69 327s, 350s and 396/325 & 396/350,
while the Paddock sells a PAD01661 4bbl quadrajet said to fit 1969 all
trans / 350CID & they list a different PAD01187 4bbl quadrajet said to
fit 1972 all trans / all engines - given that I have a 1969 vehicle with
may be a 1972 quadrajet, would there be any real difference in these 2
carburetors outside of possible visual differences and could their use be
criss-crossed between 69 and 72 vehicles?).

3) Is there a way I can tell exactly what year quadrajet is on my vehicle
currently? (i.e. is there an identifying characteristic and/or ID # on it
that I could see that would tell me for sure without me having to take
the carburetor off it? Seems to me that when I first bought the vehicle,
I looked for numbers but didn't find much of anything that anyone could
decode for me).

4) Outside of the Year One, PADDOCK and OPG/Edelbrock models listed
above, can anyone recommend any other "national" specific sources/models
for a replacement quadrajet for me? (and does anyone think I might be
able to find a new or rebuilt one locally through my local auto parts
stores / suppliers - e.g. NAPA and the likes of them)?

5) When changing a carburetor, is there any other miscellaneous h/w or
gaskets that I would need to replace? (I see that OPG and Year One list a
heat insulator/heat shield that goes between the carburetor and intake
but I don't see them list any other gaskets or h/w - would I be able to
reuse the insulator/shield I have & I if I do need to change a gasket,
where would I be able to find one?).

As always, *thanks* for any info anyone can give me!

Jim -69-SS396- H.
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.

-----------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_________________________________________________
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here

Reply via email to