good point Herb, hadnt thought of the clutch/tire slipage.....
 
 
 
         
             Rob Means
"be good,if not,be good at it
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 06, 2002 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Richmond 6 speed?

David,
 
The only thing I had to do for the ROD is to move the crossmember back so the front mount hole on the crossmember ligned up with the rear mount hole on the frame.  I then welded a tab to the frame to extend the mount back about 2 inches or so.  Once that was done, I drilled two holes in the new tabs to lign up with the rear holes on the crossmember.  I can't remember how many inches, but the driveshaft was also shortened.  Other than that, it pretty much fell into place.
 
The torque rating is given as 450lbs, but my understanding is that it's a "static" rating, as in the output shaft is locked while torque is being applied to the input shaft.  Needless to say, I don't think there are many street cars that get enough traction to where their engine's torque can duplicate the static rating.  Plus you have to consider clutch slippage, the fact that the car will be moving (gears turning) while the torque is applied, etc.
 
cYa-
 
Herb
66 El Camino
 
 
 
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:00:05 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone know if the Richmond 6 speed is a straight bolt in for a 69 chevelle/elky as a swap for the current 4 speed I've got.
I'd like to do the Tremeck 5 speed, but it's more money and more work to install, from what I remember hearing. So is my memory correct, is the Richmond 6 speed an easy placement?
As Herb's got one in his '66 I'm assuming they'll stand up to a BB motor, yes?
Thanks guys,
David '69 SS el Camino
 


Reply via email to