Rick,

thanks ! that was interesting.

Andr�

> Andre
>    Check this thread at Chevelle Tech, http://www.chevelles.com/forum/
Forum9/HTML/009775.html   There is a poster BTN dzauto who has a wealth 
of info on the 400.  He is running 3 or 4 in different cars, one of whic
h is a 421.  If you email him directly, he may be able to help you avoid
 some pitfalls.  Or do a search on his user name -
 lots of info there.  Personnally I'm an idiot with motor stuff, but tho
se "in-the-know" at TC respect his input.
> rick
> ---------- "=?iso-8859-1?Q?[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> From: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?[EMAIL PROTECTED]?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Re:_[Chevelle-List]_Small_Block?=
> Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:41:31 +0200
> 
> Thank you all
> 
> by switching the rods 180deg. what do you mean ?
> How does the piston come higer up in the bore doing this.
> 
> What I'm thinking about building (over an extended period of time 
> because of cost) is 3,75" X 4,155" with 6" rods or if possible 3,875" 
> or 4" stroke. that would be 406, 421 or 434 cid = BB torque
> 
> Filling the block halfway with block filler and put on milodon main ca
ps
> 
> I have a friend racing with two 406's and my other friend have a 400 
> cid with a small blower in his street driven 57 Stepside, they are bot
h 
> happy so I think I will give it a try.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andr�
> 
> 
> 
> > Also for higher compression with a 400 using 350 rods you can turn t
he
>  350
> > small block rods 180 deg. Thus bringing the piston higher to the top
 o
> f the
> > block. You must have a strong starter in this situation though. I ra
n 
> this
> > combo for some time years ago dirt tack racing. Man does it pack a w
al
> lop.
> > 
> > JDHall
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Rob Thorburn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 3:04 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Small Block
> > 
> > 
> > > Hello Andre'
> > > Here is what I know.  The 400 Small block is the only Small block 
to
>  come
> > > with 5.5" rods.  All the other Small-
> blocks came with 5.7" rods.  Chevy
> > did
> > > this . . . to make things fit better?  I am guessing that they did
 n
> ot
> > want
> > > the wrist-
pin so high on the piston.  However, racers seem to "see"
> > > advantage in longer rods and high wrist pin placement.  The other
> > compromise
> > > was to simese the cylinder walls.  This means that there is no wat
er
> > cooling
> > > where the cylinders are closest.  This might cause some minor dist
or
> tion
> > in
> > > the cylinder wall because the non water cooled area will run a lit
tl
> e
> > > hotter, however; that is "no big deal" compared to the fifty plus 
cu
> bic
> > > inches gained.  The reason I mention it is: the two mods Chevy mad
e,
>  work
> > > against finding a good block.  First the shortened rods increase t
he
>  "rod
> > > angle" a lot.  Increased rod angle puts side load on the piston, a
nd
>  wears
> > > out the cylinder walls faster.  The other modification, the simese
d
> > cylinder
> > > walls, make it difficult to overbore much without serious overheat
in
> g
> > > problems.  Chevy says: Maximum safe overbore is .030" on a Small-
> block,
> > and
> > > .060" on a Big-
> block.  I know machinists go way over those specs, but the
> > > risk is a engine that always runs hot.
> > >   OK, sorry for the negitivity.  Now for the plus side, my buddy L
ou
> ie
> > wore
> > > out the 350 in his truck, and found a used 400.  WOW, the torque i
nc
> rease
> > is
> > > fantastic.  It is a completely different motor!  It sounds differe
nt
> > through
> > > the exhaust, and the off idle torque is unreal.  I will be looking
 f
> or a
> > > big-CI Small block for my next project.
> > >
> > > Rob '67 Malibu
> > >         '67 El Camino (In a basket)
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:57 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] Small Block
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > > Does somebody know if a production (not bowtie)
> 400 cid small block can
> > > > take 3,875" stroke without any big mods ?
> > > > Same question for 4" stroke.
> > > > We are talking about steel rods.
> > > >
> > > > Can a standard deck small block take longer rods than 6" (6,125"
 o
> r
> > > > 6,2")
> > > >
> > > > max overbore is 0,040", right ?
> > > >
> > > > I'm asking because a friend wants to give me his 400 block
> > > > He says I can have it for free but i want to pay it, what is a f
ai
> r
> > > > price ?
> > > >
> > > > thanks !
> > > >
> > > > Andr�
> > > >
> > > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > > To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> > > > To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----------------------------------------------------
> > > To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> > > To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -----------------------------------------------------
> > To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> > To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> rick schaefer
> 72 El camino
> http://www.endrud.net/elcamino/rick1972elky.html
> ACES #00140
> Team Chevelle #00038
> 
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
> To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

-----------------------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html
To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to