Yes, but if that is the one difference between two cars that otherwise earned equal points, who should win? I would say definitely the person who has gone to the trouble of keeping the car that much more original. After all, that's why they are called the "Original Unrestored" and "Original Restored" classes. If you want to compete in an Original class, you have to have all the t's crossed and the i's dotted. Still, it's always relative to the competition. If some of the competitors have gone to that trouble, then I think it should be taken into account.
John Nasta -----Original Message----- I don't think guys should be penalized for consumable products (i.e. battery,tires,hoses,belts) or any equipment that makes thier car safer to drive (i.e. brakes, shocks, radials vs bias ply). If you deduct for tires are you going to deduct if they have one piece brake rotors (original was two piece) or gas shocks. It gets really hairy as to where you stop. Just my .02 Trooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Judging criteria for shows.... question always comes up should we duduct for guys using radial tires on their chevelles. For the original unrestored and Original Restored, answer is yes in my opinion. Other classes... maybe not. > > Question.... > > In what year were the radial tires first introduced/available for our chevelles? > > Thanks > > Donnie > > Donnie > > ----------------------------------------------------- > To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html > To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe please visit www.chevelles.net/list.html To start a new topic, send mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
