Title: Message
The Torker II is designed for the 2500-6500 RPM range and is a single plane design.  IMO, for street/everyday use a better choice would be a dual plane like the Performer or even the Performer Air-Gap designed for idle-5500 RPM.

Dale McIntosh
TC Gold #92/ACES #1709
67SS/67 Elky
Dale’s Place
Team 67
Midwest Chevelles

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of JAMES GROOVER
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 7:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] RE: carbs.

this is my first time talking on but im new to the chevelle club i have just got a 67ss lot of work to do but engine is very strong 350 with edelbrock 650 and a torqer 2 in take someone told me not a good combo could someone tell me what is thank you
----- Original Message -----
From: Don
Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2003 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] RE: carbs.

Hi Gino,
Well, I really like my Edelbrock carb & manifold setup... but I doubt that the gas mileage is any better & maybe not as good as a good Q-jet setup.
The key word is "good". Q-jet's are either great or they're junk. If you have a good one or know how to make it a good one, they're hard to beat for an all around street carb. It just seems that so many of them are not built right & end up running bad.
My 2 cents,
Don
--------
 

Well, I'm glad this whole q-jet/edelbrock issue came up because I was originally thinking to swapping over to a edel 1405 and edel performer intake, which I was told was gonna improve my fuel economy, as well as help out in the power department, in comparison to my stock setup. So thinking fuel efficiency, would you guys recommend I rebuild my stock q-jet and keep my stock manifold over swapping over to the edel stuff? Buy the way, my q-jet is on my 1964 327 Elky.

Thanks,

Gino

Reply via email to