|
Oh, and I think your
right about cars under construction. They should have their own area away from
the show cars. Too much distraction for the spectators.
Rich
ACES #
05066
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2003 5:27
AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] oregon
show
Personally, I like
them lined up by years. You then can see the way the cars have changed over
the years. SUPER CHEVY shows do it that way and I thought it was a good idea.
Just my opinion. 194 cars is a lot. That must have been a good show. You guys
are doing something right. Congratulations
Rich
ACES #
05066
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 2:42
PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-List] oregon
show
Well, yesterday wrapped up our 2nd annual show. we
were hoping for 200 cars (138 last year) and we almost did. When we closed
the gates for registration at 12:30 PM there were 194 cars. we have already
set a goal of 225 cars for next year. i would like to ask everyone
some questions. this year we did not put the cars in order 64 first etc. we
mixed them and kept the years that kind of are the same apart. 64-65 /
66-67/ 68-69/ 70-72 were all spread out. anyone have any comments on that?
i liked the idea of not starting with 64s but i didn't like the cars
all spread out. i thought we should have started with any year and then put
the next year and so forth. (if we started with 67 then 68 , 69,
etc.). also i felt any car under construction should have been in an area by
itself and not with the year it was. one under construction car was a front
clip off of a 68 chevelle and it was in the front row where you walked in
the gate. you can email me off the list if you like with suggestions.
Larry
(Z)
|
