wow, this is cool

thanks alot, I think that 292s are quite close to 462s and I dont have any flow files.

I think I'll be quite happy with this engine as a start while dreaming of a twin turbo.

thanks alot

Andr�



> I had to make a few tweaks, but yes I think you will be right at 350 HP
> and 400 lb-ft torque.  I used Dyno2000 and was able to set the engine to
> 355, 10.5:1, Summit-1104 cam, increased lift to 0.496", selected a dual
> plane manifold, 600CFM carburetor, small tube headers with mufflers, and
> I had to sub in the GM 462 head because I don't have a 292 in my
> dataset.  I would assume that they are close, but I don't know.  The
> 1.6:1 rockers will also change other cam specs a bit, but I did not
> modify duration and overlap by the few degrees you should get.
>
> Peak HP: 361 @ 5,000 RPM
> Peak TQ: 402 @ 4,000 RPM
> 
> Here are the curves:
> http://ep.com/brad/ForumPix/andregraph.gif
> And the table:
> http://ep.com/brad/ForumPix/andretable.gif
>
> If you have flow numbers for your heads (or can find a flow file), get
> them to me and I'll rerun the simulation.  I have old style SBC head
> flow files for the 441 (76 cc chamber), 462 (62 cc), and 882 (76 cc)
> heads.
>
> Brad Waller     ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> '66 Convertible | 327/dead | 4-speed   | Wilwood Brakes | 245/45/16 BFGs
> '67 Chevelle    | ex-SS396 | 355/700R4 | '79 F-Body Brakes
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] My combo on desktop dyno.
> >
> > Med Vennlig Hilsen/Kind Regards/Cordiali Saluti
> >
> > Andr� Broe Jensen
> >
> > Would someone be so kind to run my combo on their desktop dyno
> >
> > 355 cid
> > 10,5 compression
> > Summit 282deg cam.
> > Intake & Exhaust duration 224deg at 0,50�
> > Intake & Exhaust lift 0,496� with 1,6 ratio rockers
> > Camel humps 292 Heads 2,02 & 1,60 stainless valves,
> > Edelbrock Performer RPM manifold,
> > Edelbrock 600cfm Performer carb, manual choke
> > Hei Distributor with MSD coil and module.
> >
> > Will this make 350 hp???
> >
> > Thanks !
> >
> > Andr�
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to