I believe you. Is that connected in any way to this discussion of how to achieve better cooling in a car that runs hot?
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 1:05 PM To: The Chevelle Mailing List Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question My 66 was factory 4 blade fan, rad size with 2 spd and no shroud. Dave Ingersoll,Ontario My web site: http://members.tripod.com/benj30/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Nasta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:53 PM Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question > As Brad pointed out, the thermostat has more to do with engine warming than > cooling. A fan shroud, a higher volume fan, a smaller WP pulley, or a bigger > (or less restricted) radiator would help. > > John Nasta > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Benjamin > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 12:29 PM > To: The Chevelle Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] thermostat question > > I tried a 160 in my 1966 chevelle and it didn't work very well. There was no > fan shroud factory and ounce the motor got up to 160 it wouldn't (open/ > close) cycle. It would stay open therefore not very good cooling. The 180 > worked fine it it. > > Dave > Ingersoll,Ontario > My web site: http://members.tripod.com/benj30/ > > > > >
