Trooper,

I boxed the stock uppers on my 66.  After talking with GW, they recommended
I retain the stock uppers w/ rubber bushings (w/o boxing them) to keep
everything on top loose (aids articulation of the rear axle assembly).  I
boxed them anyway.

Herb Lumpp
http://users.adelphia.net/~hlump/index.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Trooper
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 9:35 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] rear control arms


Oops. I meant I've never seen stock BOXED rear upper on a 68-72.

Trooper

----- Original Message -----
From: "Trooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] rear control arms


> Herb,
>   I've never seen stock rear uppers on 68-72 chevelles. What years did
they
> offer boxed uppers?  The F41 heavy duty suspension only came with boxed
> lowers.
>
> Trooper
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Herb Lumpp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 4:46 PM
> Subject: RE: [Chevelle-list] rear control arms
>
>
> > Hi Fred,
> >
> > If I were you I would reuse the stock upper arms.  I have the same GW
> lower
> > arms on my Elky with a pair of boxed stock upper arms with the original
> > rubber bushings and no rear sway bar.  That combined with the GW
Negative
> > Roll front suspension and my Elky handles like a dream.  In fact, I'd go
> so
> > far as to say it handles better than my Vette, which isn't stock either.
> >
> > Save your money by using the stock uppers and keep the GW lowers.  Just
my
> > opinion.
> >
> > Herb Lumpp
> > http://users.adelphia.net/~hlump/index.htm
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Fred Dowaliby
> > Sent: Friday, April 02, 2004 7:45 AM
> > To: The Chevelle Mailing List
> > Subject: [Chevelle-list] rear control arms
> >
> >
> > I just bought a set of lower rear control arms from Global West, the
> > ones with the spherical bearing and Del-a-lum bushings.
> >
> > I am now considering those offered by Edelbrock as a cost cutting
> > alternative for the uppers. They are about $90(Jeg's)  less than GW and
> > also use a spherical bearing on the frame side, although poly on the
> > axle side.
> >
> > I would appreciate any advice/opinions on this, particularly from
> > anyone who has purchased those from Global. This is for a cruiser, so
> > out and out performance is not the issue, but I still want to do it
> > right.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >
> >
>
>



Reply via email to