The travel of the shock would prevent the boing boing effect, and although I have broken a shock
or shock mount, I've never launched a spring (in my '67's).  In my '64 wagon, the springs were
bolted on the original 10 bolt, not on the 12 bolt I put in out of a '67.  Ed in SF

Pelle Andersson wrote:
Yes it seemes so but...
That might prove to be a hairy experience if one should hit a
major road bump...
boing... boing... & then ;-)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Trooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "The Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Q: Rear coils?


Not in 68-72. No bolts strictly kept in place from compression.

Trooper

"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
They are supposed to be bolted to the axle. but not to the frame..
Ciao André

My 72 is not.  When I take the rear shocks loose and the rear end
drops out
they come.  Boing, boing.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Pelle Andersson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Chevelle Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 5:47 AM
Subject: [Chevelle-list] Q: Rear coils?


Are the rear coils supposed to be bolted to the rear
axle & body?

Best Regards
Pelle
*************************************************
Chevelle Gearheads
http://hem.bredband.net/gearheads/











Reply via email to