Sorry to hear that about your job,Dale. We still planning to attend the KC Regional?
Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm
----- Original Message -----
From: Dale

I agree that something should have raised a flag with a drop from 460 to 406 from one run to another. <G>

 

Haven’t had much time to do anything with the Elky except drive it.  With DFAS (my ‘Employer of Choice’) closing the Fort Sill location which they can no do with BRAC $$$$ instead of their own funding and chopping the legs out from under us two network guys by contracting that out to boot, I’m a little hesitant to get too committed since I may have to retire.

 

Reference CD is coming along well though and I hope to have it finished by October 1 – in time for XMAS giving.

 

Dale McIntosh

67 El Camino

1967 Chevelle Reference CD beta now available!
http://www.chevellestuff.com/cdoffer.htm

ACES #1709/TC Gold #92


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Clint Hooper
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 12:16 PM
To: The Chevelle Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] GMPP 572

 

Just to give you a little perspective,Dale,cause you have seen the car but the stock displacement LT5 in my 90 ZR-1 with ported heads & intake plenum,Jeal intake cams,and Jeal 2" headers made almost 425rwhp. On that 572,going from 460rwhp to just 406 would have been very disturbing and indicative of some problem. Another possible cause could have been heat soak as big inch tall deck engines like that are hard to keep cool.

Off topic but how's your 67 Camino coming along? You done any more to it?

Clint Hooper
H&H Custom,owner
1969 El Camino ProTourer
2001 H-D FLHR custom bagger
http://dalesplace.com/misc/friends/clint/clint_hooper.htm

----- Original Message -----

From: Dale

 

I’m sure everyone has their own ‘numbers’ but http://x-ram.com/dynotuning.html was my source.  I’m also sure that many tests would result in many answers just like the drop from 460hp on the first pull to 406hp on the second.  I agree that HP (or torque) per $ is probably not the most efficient on the 572 but still, 400 rear wheel hp is impressive.

 

Dale McIntosh

67 El Camino

1967 Chevelle Reference CD beta now available!

ACES #1709/TC Gold #92


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2005 11:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] GMPP 572

 

In a message dated 6/25/2005 11:06:22 A.M. Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

Given 35% loss for automatic trans -
on average

Never heard this before.......15%...MAYBE 20% MAX.  That 572 is a DOG for what it costs.

Reply via email to