----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005 10:13
AM
Subject: Re: [Chevelle-list] Lifters
101
Hydraulic rollers are the way to go if you've got the
extra money. More lift and the valves can be held closed or open for a more
optimal length of time to facilitate filling/emptying the chambers. In other
words, the steepness of the lobe incline can be more radical because the
roller lets the parts move against one another without friction. The BIG
payoff is in lift and lobe shape and maximum air/fuel charge in the cylinder.
There is just no arguing with it.
Hydraulic flat is next best, IMHO, and is what I went
with on my 402 build. I used Edelbrock oval port heads and a Comp Cams
Xtreme Energy grind and I'm pickled tink over it. It runs and sounds
outstanding (it had THE best idle lope I have ever heard in a car that is
driveable - positively gnarly). I've been very happy with my choice but, that
said, if I had it to do over again, I'd go the extra dough and get rollers.
THere's just something about all the rotating hardware on bearings that makes
perfect sense to my wee little dinasaur brain. Compared to rollers, flat
tappets seem, well, so 70's...
craig E
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, September 21, 2005
10:57 AM
Subject: [Chevelle-list] Lifters
101
Can someone reply with a brief tutorial on
lifters? I'm getting ready to start assembling my 396, and I'd like your
opinions on the pros and cons of each of the following:
hydraulic flat
hydraulic roller
mechanical flat
mechanical roller
In my specific case, I'm looking to build a
reliable driver I can use on the Power Tour next year, but take to the
track for a bit of fun now and then. Money is an issue, but I wouldn't mind
spending a bit more if I can pick up some ponies along the
way...
Thanks,
Larry Shouse