See #147 <https://github.com/ChicagoBoss/boss_db/issues/147> on GitHub for
more infos.
Greets
David
Am Samstag, 18. Januar 2014 16:37:04 UTC+1 schrieb David Robakowski:
>
> Hi Zach,
>
> thanks for your info and the fast reply! Ok great and I'll create an issue
> request on GitHub, to keep better track of this possible issue.
>
> Greets
> David
>
> Am Freitag, 17. Januar 2014 12:26:52 UTC+1 schrieb Zachary Kessin:
>>
>> I am not sure we are generating the right thing for dialyzer to work on
>> boss_db modules, I will add it to my list of things to work on
>>
>> --Zach
>>
>> On 1/17/14, 1:00 PM, David Robakowski wrote:
>>
>> Hi ChicagoBoss community,
>>
>> first of all thanks for the great framework and all the libs that comes
>> with it.
>>
>> In one of my projects I’m using boss_db as a standalone “ORM” without
>> CB. The models are compiling fine with R16B02 and I’m able to
>> store/retrieve data from a db with it. When it comes to static code
>> analysis with dialyzer, the models break the analysis and I’m getting the
>> following errors:
>>
>>
>> dialyzer: Analysis failed with error:
>>
>> Could not scan the following file(s):
>> Could not get abstract code for: .../ebin/test_model.beam
>> Recompile with +debug_info or analyze starting from source code
>> Could not get abstract code for: .../ebin/test_model2.beam
>> Recompile with +debug_info or analyze starting from source code
>> Last messages in the log cache:
>> Reading files and computing callgraph...
>> make: *** [dialyzer] Error 1
>>
>> Used compiler options:
>>
>>
>> {erl_opts, [
>> warn_unused_import
>> ,warn_export_all
>> ,warn_export_vars
>> ,warnings_as_errors
>> ,{d, debug}
>> ,debug_info
>> ,fail_on_warning
>> ,{parse_transform, lager_transform}
>> ]}.
>>
>> Dialyzer command with configuration parameters:
>>
>> dialyzer -Wunderspecs -Wrace_conditions -Wunmatched_returns -
>> Werror_handling --plts ~/.dialyzer_plt deps.plt -r ebin
>>
>> Does maybe someone know how it’s possible to ignore the models for the
>> analyzing part or is there maybe a configuration I’m missing?
>>
>> Thanks
>> David
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "ChicagoBoss" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/22528bb5-cf5a-470c-845a-19e107ff6c74%40googlegroups.com
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"ChicagoBoss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/d302c4ee-b728-4899-9a46-dc6e1ab5f9c9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
