i use CB On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 at 2:50:20 AM UTC+3, rlander wrote: > > Hey guys, just wanted to share a story. > > Some time ago I inherited the code base for a realtime web app written in > nodejs that was old, very unstable, and leaking memory left and right. As > we decided to rewrite everything, I spent a month prototyping a few > different solutions: > > - python + pushpin + nginx > - clojure + redis + nginx > - go > - elixir + rethinkdb + postgres > > It just bothered me that I had to use so many moving parts or use worse > languages like go. > > Then it hit me: Chicago Boss is the perfect framework for this kind of > problem. To cut the story short, it only took me 1/3 of the time to write > the prototype, it uses less moving parts (I ditched all external services > like pushpin or nginx push module) and performs very well. > > So, I confess I was bearish on Chicago Boss, pmods being deprecated, Evan > leaving and all. But this little experiment made me realize that Chicago > Boss still fills a niche that others don't. Elixir/phoenix is a nice stack, > but I find Erlang much more elegant and succinct. > > So, is anybody else still using Chicago Boss? How can we make it relevant > again? > > BTW, thanks Dmitry for carrying the torch forward and, if there's anyone > still listening, let's make some noise! > > rlander >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ChicagoBoss" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/chicagoboss. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/chicagoboss/79e1cb66-42e8-4b4a-ab0c-31a2cbf18533%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
