On Feb 12, 2008 9:37 AM, Leonardo Valeri Manera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/02/2008, Graham Fawcett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > OK, you're hit. :-) I've updated the CGI, they are all .tar.gz. > > Actually, you can use any extension you want, the current script is > > very permissive. > Well, don't expose yourself to possible security issues on my account! ;)
Oh, it's nothing that terrible. I just cheated when I wrote the regex for parsing requests to download eggs: it matches on the prefix only. /gentoo-eggs/foobar-3-.* will contain the body of the current foobar.egg from the release-3 branch. > .tar.gz does it for us, I've gotten rid of the 'orrible hack, in fact > I've gotten rid of src_unpack() entirely, the default handles it. > > Dependencies work, compile & install work, the .setup-info has the > actual paths (a little post-compile sed -i does the trick), I've just > make an ebuild for an egg with a test suite, but I expect that to work > too. Awesome! I wish I were a gentoo user, so I could enjoy your good work. ;-) > Basically, ready when you are :D OK. If you believe the load on the CGI will be reasonably low, then keep using it for now. Our university has fat pipes, it's just that they might not appreciate a DDOS. ;-) If I understand you correctly, you have a few systems that will grab eggs and prepare them as gentoo packages, so the CGI won't be pounded on by hundreds of users. Correct? Fellow Chicken-hackers, do you think we could move this CGI or something like it to a more permanent location, e.g, the call-with-current-continuation.org site? Graham _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
