Chicken Scheme, along with its extension libraries, supports a large superset of R6RS. Given what you have written below, I do not understand why you think R6RS should be a guideline for a "punchlist" of features to implement in Chicken. It is not a particularly good specification, and equivalent or better functionality is already provided in Chicken anyway.
-Ivan Thomas Bushnell BSG <t...@becket.net> writes: > I'm sorry; those are reasons not to approve r6rs. There are many > things, it seems to me, which don't belong in the standard, but which > should be in any good Scheme system. > > Are you saying that if X should not be in the standard, then it is wrong > for Chicken Scheme to implement X? Suppose r6rs had mandated the > Chicken Scheme FFI; would you begin lobbying for its removal from > Chicken Scheme? > _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
