Thomas Bushnell BSG scripsit: > The following code does not work: > > (define-syntax foo > (syntax-rules () > ((_) > (cond-expand > (chicken (display "all good\n")))))) > (foo) >
Calling (features) shows that the feature name is "chicken:", not "chicken". If you change the above to reference chicken:, all is well. This is not backward compatible and is still probably a bug, but at least it's a simple bug. On the other hand, (cond-expand (chicken (display "all good\n"))) does output "all good" right away. -- My corporate data's a mess! John Cowan It's all semi-structured, no less. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan But I'll be carefree co...@ccil.org Using XSLT On an XML DBMS. _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list Chicken-hackers@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
