On Sun, Jul 04, 2010 at 01:17:52AM +0200, Felix wrote: > Hello! > > > Because I can't figure out how to extend `find-files' without > changing its signature (something I don't want for compatibility > reasons), can someone suggest an alternative name for a new > variant that can later supersede `find-files'?
That's a hard one. find-files is the perfect name for this procedure :( Maybe DIRECTORY-FILTER, as it's like a (recursive) version of DIRECTORY but with a filtered result set? Cheers, Peter -- http://sjamaan.ath.cx -- "The process of preparing programs for a digital computer is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic experience much like composing poetry or music." -- Donald Knuth _______________________________________________ Chicken-hackers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
