On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 04:16:52AM -0400, Felix wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have added read-syntax for blob-literals and currently use
>
> #{<hex...>}
>
> Since this may block the use of "#{ ... }" for user-defined read-syntax,
> I want to ask if perhaps another syntax might be preferrable.
I think the braces look pretty ugly, actually :)
Because of Javascript/JSON and Ruby braces suggest "hash" to me rather
than blob. But I'm not sure if that's a very compelling reason not
to use it :)
> Any
> ideas? Or would the syntax above be ok for such a built-in object.
What about #blob(...) or #m(...) (for "memory") if "blob" causes
trouble with binary number literal syntax?
By the way, how is the data represented? Will entering it like this
be dependent on the reading machine's endianness?
Cheers,
Peter
--
http://sjamaan.ath.cx
--
"The process of preparing programs for a digital computer
is especially attractive, not only because it can be economically
and scientifically rewarding, but also because it can be an aesthetic
experience much like composing poetry or music."
-- Donald Knuth
_______________________________________________
Chicken-hackers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-hackers
